<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thinking through Pascal&#8217;s Pensees</title>
	<atom:link href="http://andrewczink.wordpress.com/2008/04/13/thinking-through-pascals-pensees/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://andrewczink.wordpress.com/2008/04/13/thinking-through-pascals-pensees/</link>
	<description>Journal for the Graduate Liberal Studies program at SFU</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 22:16:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Czink</title>
		<link>http://andrewczink.wordpress.com/2008/04/13/thinking-through-pascals-pensees/#comment-78</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Czink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 14:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewczink.wordpress.com/?p=35#comment-78</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment George. Much appreciated. I keep coming back to the ideas here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment George. Much appreciated. I keep coming back to the ideas here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Franklin</title>
		<link>http://andrewczink.wordpress.com/2008/04/13/thinking-through-pascals-pensees/#comment-77</link>
		<dc:creator>George Franklin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 01:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewczink.wordpress.com/?p=35#comment-77</guid>
		<description>Great Job...that was a fantastic breakdown of Pascal&#039;s main argument.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Job&#8230;that was a fantastic breakdown of Pascal&#8217;s main argument.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: morbidity</title>
		<link>http://andrewczink.wordpress.com/2008/04/13/thinking-through-pascals-pensees/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>morbidity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 01:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewczink.wordpress.com/?p=35#comment-61</guid>
		<description>Morbidity says : I absolutely agree with this !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Morbidity says : I absolutely agree with this !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaz Maslanka</title>
		<link>http://andrewczink.wordpress.com/2008/04/13/thinking-through-pascals-pensees/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaz Maslanka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 01:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewczink.wordpress.com/?p=35#comment-43</guid>
		<description>It seems to me that the wall we are hitting our head against is the wall of metaphor. While metaphor has a logical structure it meaning (understanding) is not.  God is a metaphor furthermore; if we all viewed God this way then God would not be so distasteful. This idea of God will always be distasteful if we treat (He/She/It) as a hard rational fact. The problem is that humans are inherently irrational, magical and possess a tenuous grasp of reality (whatever that is).  It is only by the virtue that we ‘bump’ and ‘grope’ our way through physical nature that we are forced into the rational.  
Thanks for the nice post,

Kaz</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me that the wall we are hitting our head against is the wall of metaphor. While metaphor has a logical structure it meaning (understanding) is not.  God is a metaphor furthermore; if we all viewed God this way then God would not be so distasteful. This idea of God will always be distasteful if we treat (He/She/It) as a hard rational fact. The problem is that humans are inherently irrational, magical and possess a tenuous grasp of reality (whatever that is).  It is only by the virtue that we ‘bump’ and ‘grope’ our way through physical nature that we are forced into the rational.<br />
Thanks for the nice post,</p>
<p>Kaz</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
